Swarmix AILoop It

One prompt. One review-ready result.

Browse the Loop goals library, choose what you want completed, and add your context. Codex creates, critiques, refines, and checks the result against the goal's proof criteria in one task.

Loop goals

One prompt

Proof

Loop goals library

Choose a loop goal

Each goal packages the workflow, proof criteria, limits, and approval boundaries into one customizable prompt for a review-ready deliverable or a clear blocker report.

12 loop goals · 6 categories

Showing all 12 loop goals across six practical categories.

Product & UX

experimental

First Value Sprint

Find and remove the biggest obstacle between a new user and the product's first useful result.

Bring
Product surface · First value event
Creates
A focused product change or review-ready recommendation with before-and-after journey evidence.
Up to 3 iterations

Product & UX

experimental

Mobile Journey Rescue

Repair the first mobile usability blocker in one important product journey.

Bring
Primary journey · Product surface
Creates
One scoped mobile usability fix with responsive and accessibility evidence.
Up to 3 iterations

Design & Prototyping

experimental

Visual Consistency Pass

Find and repair the most visible inconsistency against an existing interface language.

Bring
Target interface · Reference language
Creates
One reviewable interface improvement with before-and-after visual evidence.
Up to 3 iterations

Design & Prototyping

experimental

Clickable Flow Prototype

Turn a clear workflow idea into the smallest clickable interface that can be reviewed.

Bring
User job · Flow boundary
Creates
A local clickable prototype covering one primary path and its essential states.
Up to 3 iterations

Research & Decisions

experimental

Feedback Theme Synthesis

Turn a bounded set of feedback into traceable themes and one evidence-backed next decision.

Bring
Feedback set · Decision context
Creates
A concise research brief with themes, source references, confidence, and one recommended next action.
Up to 3 iterations

Research & Decisions

experimental

Competitor Evidence Brief

Compare a narrow competitor question using current, cited evidence and explicit uncertainty.

Bring
Decision question · Comparison set
Creates
An evidence-backed comparison brief with citations, inference labels, and a bounded recommendation.
Up to 3 iterations

Content & Messaging

experimental

Landing Page Message Pass

Turn approved evidence into one clear landing-page message direction and primary action.

Bring
Audience · Offer · Approved evidence
Creates
Three message directions and one selected landing-page concept with assumptions marked.
Up to 3 iterations

Content & Messaging

experimental

Source-to-Content Pack

Repurpose one approved source into a small channel-ready content set without adding unsupported claims.

Bring
Approved source · Voice guidance
Creates
A three-format content pack with a source-claim checklist and no external publishing.
Up to 3 iterations

Data & Evaluation

experimental

Data Quality Snapshot

Measure the most important quality risks in a supplied dataset without modifying the source.

Bring
Dataset · Quality rules
Creates
A data-quality report with reconciled counts, prioritized risks, and no source mutation.
Up to 3 iterations

Data & Evaluation

experimental

Experiment Results Brief

Turn bounded experiment evidence into a decision brief without overstating what the data proves.

Bring
Hypothesis · Results
Creates
A concise decision brief with verified metrics, caveats, and a bounded recommendation.
Up to 3 iterations

Operations & Support

experimental

SOP From Messy Notes

Turn incomplete process notes into a usable procedure with gaps and approval points exposed.

Bring
Process notes · Operator
Creates
A review-ready SOP with prerequisites, steps, decision points, evidence, owners, and open questions.
Up to 3 iterations

Operations & Support

experimental

Support Knowledge Gap Audit

Compare recurring support questions with existing guidance and prioritize one missing answer.

Bring
Support questions · Existing help content
Creates
A prioritized gap report and one draft knowledge-base answer with source references.
Up to 3 iterations

Run with proof

Run prompt for Codex: First Value Sprint

Ready to run

1

Goal

What should Codex achieve?

2

Success check

How will we know it's done?

3

Loop depth

Set the bounds for this run.

Selected pattern

First Value Sprint

Loop goal
Change

Find and remove the biggest obstacle between a new user and the product's first useful result.

Improve the path from first interaction to useful product value. Artifact: A focused product change or review-ready recommendation with before-and-after journey evidence.

Max attempts

3
1–7 attempts

Stop if

Proof contract

Review-ready deliverable · Rubric evidence · Approval gates

4

Launch

Review and start in Codex.

Generated loop prompt

Run this Loop It goal in Codex as one end-to-end task. Follow the instructions directly as a normal agent task.

Loop goal: First Value Sprint
Category: Product & UX
Goal: Walk through the first-time user journey, identify the single biggest barrier to reaching value, make the smallest credible improvement, and prove the journey is clearer on desktop and mobile.

Workspace boundary:
Work only with the source material and workspace available in this task. Do not assume this is a software repository or that code changes are required. Keep the scope to one reviewable artifact or improvement.

Required inputs:
- Product surface: The local app, prototype, screenshots, or flow to review. (required)
- First value event: The user action that proves the product became useful. (required)

Expected artifact:
A focused product change or review-ready recommendation with before-and-after journey evidence.

Expected result: Review-ready deliverable
Evidence to capture: Rubric evidence
User proof requirement: Return Journey notes, Before-and-after evidence, Remaining risks that demonstrates: The first value event is stated in observable terms. The highest-impact friction point is supported by inspected evidence. The revised journey completes at desktop and mobile widths without introducing a new dead end.
Proof mode: hybrid
Iteration cap: 3

Workflow: UNDERSTAND -> CREATE -> CRITIQUE -> REFINE -> PROVE.

1. UNDERSTAND — inspect the supplied material, identify the audience and decision, and list missing inputs without inventing them.
2. CREATE — produce the smallest complete version of the expected artifact using only supported claims and available evidence.
3. CRITIQUE — review the artifact against every rubric criterion and name the most consequential gap.
4. REFINE — make one focused pass that clearly improves the rubric result without expanding scope.
5. PROVE — return the artifact, criterion-by-criterion evidence, assumptions, blockers, remaining risks, and the next safe action.

Rubric criteria:
- The first value event is stated in observable terms.
- The highest-impact friction point is supported by inspected evidence.
- The revised journey completes at desktop and mobile widths without introducing a new dead end.

Approval required for:
- production writes
- external messages
- customer data access
- deploys
- irreversible changes

Do not ask me to run, copy, or paste terminal commands. Perform any necessary local inspection inside the agent workflow and keep the user-facing exchange in natural language.
Do not publish, contact customers, spend money, change accounts, write to production, deploy, or take an irreversible action without explicit approval.
Treat the deliverable as review-ready when every rubric criterion has evidence. Review-ready means the requested work is complete for review; it does not mean approved, published, or deployed.

Stop when the rubric evidence is complete, 3 iterations are reached, required input or access is missing, the same gap repeats twice, approval is needed, or an unsafe action would be required.

Return the review-ready deliverable with criterion-by-criterion evidence. If completion is blocked, return the blocker, the missing input or approval, and the safest next action.

Runs inside your local workspace.

Proof receipt (from last run)

Expand to review the verified public run.

Expand

Plugin

v0.4.0

Executor

Loop It plugin

Loop

failing-ci-repair

Iteration

1 of 3

Verifier

Project check

Result

Pass

A fresh fixture started with a failing assertion. Loop It changed test.mjs and reran the project check to pass. The checker was skipped for this smoke.

Inspect proof fixture
Proof guardrails

Start the bounded run

Agent runs the check

Agent changes repo files

Agent reports proof

A real run changes more than loop notes

Changes only under .loop-it/LOOP.md or .loop-it/progress.json mean the loop was prepared, not run.

Fallback prompt preview
Run this Loop It goal in Codex as one end-to-end task. Follow the instructions directly as a normal agent task.

Loop goal: First Value Sprint
Category: Product & UX
Goal: Walk through the first-time user journey, identify the single biggest barrier to reaching value, make the smallest credible improvement, and prove the journey is clearer on desktop and mobile.

Workspace boundary:
Work only with the source material and workspace available in this task. Do not assume this is a software repository or that code changes are required. Keep the scope to one reviewable artifact or improvement.

Required inputs:
- Product surface: The local app, prototype, screenshots, or flow to review. (required)
- First value event: The user action that proves the product became useful. (required)

Expected artifact:
A focused product change or review-ready recommendation with before-and-after journey evidence.

Expected result: Review-ready deliverable
Evidence to capture: Rubric evidence
User proof requirement: Return Journey notes, Before-and-after evidence, Remaining risks that demonstrates: The first value event is stated in observable terms. The highest-impact friction point is supported by inspected evidence. The revised journey completes at desktop and mobile widths without introducing a new dead end.
Proof mode: hybrid
Iteration cap: 3

Workflow: UNDERSTAND -> CREATE -> CRITIQUE -> REFINE -> PROVE.

1. UNDERSTAND — inspect the supplied material, identify the audience and decision, and list missing inputs without inventing them.
2. CREATE — produce the smallest complete version of the expected artifact using only supported claims and available evidence.
3. CRITIQUE — review the artifact against every rubric criterion and name the most consequential gap.
4. REFINE — make one focused pass that clearly improves the rubric result without expanding scope.
5. PROVE — return the artifact, criterion-by-criterion evidence, assumptions, blockers, remaining risks, and the next safe action.

Rubric criteria:
- The first value event is stated in observable terms.
- The highest-impact friction point is supported by inspected evidence.
- The revised journey completes at desktop and mobile widths without introducing a new dead end.

Approval required for:
- production writes
- external messages
- customer data access
- deploys
- irreversible changes

Do not ask me to run, copy, or paste terminal commands. Perform any necessary local inspection inside the agent workflow and keep the user-facing exchange in natural language.
Do not publish, contact customers, spend money, change accounts, write to production, deploy, or take an irreversible action without explicit approval.
Treat the deliverable as review-ready when every rubric criterion has evidence. Review-ready means the requested work is complete for review; it does not mean approved, published, or deployed.

Stop when the rubric evidence is complete, 3 iterations are reached, required input or access is missing, the same gap repeats twice, approval is needed, or an unsafe action would be required.

Return the review-ready deliverable with criterion-by-criterion evidence. If completion is blocked, return the blocker, the missing input or approval, and the safest next action.

Advanced: browse all loops

Choose from the full catalog of 20 bounded loops.

Recommended (1)Operations (10)Engineering (6)Product (2)Security (1)Content (1)

Run host

How the prompt works

Codex plugin

Loop It finds repository signals, recommends one bounded loop, and returns proof. Loop It repeats: plan, act, observe, decide. Loop It is not a hosted background service.

Current plugin release: v0.4.0. The generated message carries the complete goal, proof criteria, limits, and approval boundaries as normal natural-language instructions.

Prompt-first workflow

Open the prompt in Codex or copy it into another supported agent. You never need to copy a shell command from this page; the agent handles repository checks, isolated work, proof capture, and scheduled setup.

Safe fallback

If the plugin is unavailable, the same message tells Codex to run the bounded task directly. Production writes, external messages, deploys, credentials, destructive changes, and irreversible actions still require approval.

Loop

Operations

10

Engineering

6

Product

2

Security

1

Content

1

Safe by default

Bounded runs with clear stop conditions.

Evidence included

Return rubric evidence or a clear blocker.

Resumable progress

Pick up where the last run left off.